Rodrguez-Miranda v. Coquico, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Angel Edgardo Rodrguez-Miranda
Defendant: Coquico, Inc., BENIN MALIK, ASHBY PHILIPPA and Conjugal Partnership Benin-Ashby
Case Number: 3:2010cv01557
Filed: June 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Office: San Juan Office
County: Adjuntas
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 92 OPINION AND ORDER denying 82 Motion for Attorney Fees; finding as moot 84 Motion requesting Order. Signed by Judge Jose A Fuste on 11/29/2011. (mrj)
June 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 23 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Coquico, Inc. filed by Angel Edgardo Rodriguez-Miranda; DENYING 10 MOTION to dismiss First Cause of Action in Counter as to Malik Benin, Coquico, Inc. filed by Angel Ed gardo Rodriguez-Miranda; DENYING 22 MOTION to dismiss copyright and breach of contract claims as to All Defendants filed by Angel Edgardo Rodriguez-Miranda; GRANTING 20 MOTION to dismiss voluntarily wihout prejudice the copyright cause of action as to Coquico, Inc. filed by Coquico, Inc. We DISMISS, sua sponte, Benin's malicious-prosecution claim as unripe. We ORDER the parties to SHOW CAUSE, on or before June 20, 2011, as to why Defendants' claim for breach of the n on-disclosure/non-compete agreement and the previously-decided copyright-infringement claim are, or are not, based on facts constituting the same transaction or related transactions, for purposes of claim preclusion. We also ORDER the parties to SHOW CAUSE, on or before June 20, 2011, as to why summary judgment of Plaintiff's defamation claim should, or should not, be entered in Defendants' favor. Show Cause Response due by 6/20/2011.Signed by Judge Jose A Fuste on 6/7/2011.(mrj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodrguez-Miranda v. Coquico, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coquico, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BENIN MALIK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ASHBY PHILIPPA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Conjugal Partnership Benin-Ashby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angel Edgardo Rodrguez-Miranda
Represented By: Samuel F. Pamias-Portalatin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?