Rodriguez et al v. FDIC as Receiver of RG Premier Bank of Puerto Rico et al
Jocelyn Rodriguez and RG Financial Corporation |
FDIC as Receiver of RG Premier Bank of Puerto Rico and RG Mortgage Corporation |
3:2010cv01656 |
July 14, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
San Juan Office |
San Juan |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 OPINION AND ORDER granting 13 motion for summary judgment; granting 14 Motion to Dismiss. the Court will enter a separate Final Judgment dismissing the claims against FDIC and R&G Mortgage with prejudice and the claims against R&G Financial without prejudice. Signed by Judge Jose A Fuste on 09/27/2011. (dv) |
Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER - GRANTING Defendant FDIC's 11 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Exhaustion of Mandatory Administrative Claims Process; DENYING Defendant FDIC's 3 Motion Requesting Designation of Magistrate Judge; GRANTING Defendant R&G Financial Corp.'s 5 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Bankruptcy Proceedings; FINDING AS MOOT Defendant FDIC's prior 6 Motion for Stay of Proceedings. Defendant R&G Financial Corp.'s Deadline to Inform Status of Bankruptcy Proceedings due by 4/4/2011; Defendant FDIC's Deadline to Inform Status of Administrative Claims Process due by 8/4/2011. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Fuste on 3/8/2011. (mld) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.