Gautier et al v. Velez-Colon et al
| Juan C Gautier, Annabelle Lipsett, JCGL, Juan C Vilaro-Lipsett and Carlos Gautier-Lipsett |
| Sonia I Velez-Colon and Jose Morales |
| 3:2010cv01777 |
| August 11, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| Mayaguez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
236
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 163 MOTION to dismiss and for Summary Judgment; GRANTING 203 MOTION for Reconsideration as to Dismissal of all Causes of Action Against Codefendant Carlos Rivera Lopez for Lack of Participation and Absolute Inmuni ty; GRANTING 204 MOTION for Reconsideration Pertaining Absolute Immunity and Dismissal of Federal Cause of Action for Malicious Prosecution, filed by All Defendants. Defendants' request for qualified immunity is DENIED. Plaintiffs' federal law claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs' Commonwealth law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE of local court litigation. Judgment to be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Jose A. Fuste on 12/10/2013.(mrj)
|
|
Filing
33
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Dismiss. A separate judgment will be entered accordingly dismissing the failure train and supervise claims against Defendant Velez. Signed by Judge Jose A Fuste on 11/02/2011. (dv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
