Cabrera-Ruiz et al v. Rocket Learning, Inc. et al
| Ferdinand Cabrera-Ruiz and Janet Cabrera-Ruiz |
| Rocket Learning, Inc., Hiram Perez, Brenda Perez and Jaime Pales |
| 3:2010cv01865 |
| September 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| San Juan |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 56 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Janet Cabrera filed by All Defendants; GRANTING 53 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Ferdinand Cabrera filed by All Defendants. Judgment to enter dismissing Plaintiffs' Complaint in its entirety. Signed by Judge Jose A Fuste on 2/13/2012.(mrj)
|
|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 35 MOTION to Alter Judgment or for Reconsideration re 31 Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Jose A Fuste on 7/5/2011.(mrj)
|
|
Filing
31
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 13 Motion to Dismiss as to All Defendants filed by Jaime Pales, Hiram Perez, Brenda Perez. Plaintiffs' claims against Movants as defendants in their individual capacity under ADEA, PRWACA, and Law 80 are hereby DISMISSED. The court retains supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining Commonwealth causes of action against all individual codefendants, in addition to the ADEA cause of action against Rocket Learning. Signed by Judge Jose A Fuste on 5/11/2011.(mrj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
