Batista v. Cooperativa De Vivienda Jardines de San Ignacio et al
Priscilla Batista |
Cooperativa De Vivienda Jardines de San Ignacio, Carmen Couvertier-Marquez, Candido Cotto-Hernandez, Maria Ramirez-Lopez, Carlos Roman-Espada, Catherine Rivera-Calderon, Rosa Maldonado-Gonzalez and Santos Colon |
3:2010cv01953 |
October 4, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
San Juan Office |
San Juan |
Jaime Pieras |
Civil Rights: Accomodations |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 136 OPINION AND ORDER - Denied 118 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim as to Retaliation filed by Candido Cotto-Hernandez, Cristina Diaz-Atienzo, Cooperativa de Vivienda Jardines de San Ignacio, Maria Ramirez-Lopez, Carmen Couvertier -Marquez, Carlos Roman-Espada, Santos Colon, Rosa Maldonado-Gonzalez, Catherine Rivera-Calderon; Denied 119 MOTION for Summary Judgment regarding the retaliation claim and memorandum in support thereof filed by Candido Cotto-Hernandez, Cristin a Diaz-Atienzo, Cooperativa de Vivienda Jardines de San Ignacio, Maria Ramirez-Lopez, Carmen Couvertier-Marquez, Carlos Roman-Espada, Santos Colon, Rosa Maldonado-Gonzalez, Catherine Rivera-Calderon. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Camille L. Velez-Rive on 9/17/15.(ljt) |
Filing 88 OPINION AND ORDER: Finding as moot 64 Motion to Dismiss; granting 65 motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 5/15/13. (CL) Modified on 5/15/2013 as to title (er). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.