Ramos-Santos v. Hernandez-Rodriguez et al
| Nelida Ramos-Santos |
| John Doe, Richard Roe, Peter Roe, Nancy Doe, Carl Roe, Carmen G. Rodriguez-Diaz, Cuerpo de Bomberos de Puerto Rico, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and Jeremias Hernandez-Nogueras |
| 3:2011cv01105 |
| January 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| Caguas |
| Francisco A. Besosa |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 140 Motion to Strike. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Marcos E. Lopez on 7/11/12. (SB)
|
|
Filing
146
OPINION AND ORDER re 23 Motion to Dismiss; re 24 Motion to Dismiss; re 36 Motion Requesting Order; and re 117 Report and Recommendation. The Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, defendant Hernandez's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Defendants Rodriguez, Commonwealth and PRFD's motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion to dismiss is DENIED as to plaintiff's claims against defendants Commonwealth and PRFD under Title VII, and plaintiff's claims against defendant Rodriguez under Law 115 and Law 426. Finally, defendant Rodriguez's motion for qualified immunity is deemed MOOT. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 06/08/2012. (brc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
