Colondres v. Potter
Plaintiff: Angieliz Colondres
Defendant: John E. Potter
Case Number: 3:2011cv01171
Filed: February 14, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Office: San Juan Office
County: Vega Alta
Presiding Judge: Jose A Fuste
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 791
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 11 MOTION to dismiss, filed by John E. Potter. Remaining for adjudication are Plaintiff's harassment, hostile work environment, and retaliation claims under Title VII. Signed by Judge Jose A Fuste on 3/29/2012.(mrj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Colondres v. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John E. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angieliz Colondres
Represented By: Jose F. Quetglas
Represented By: Pedro R. Vazquez, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?