Situ et al v. O'Neill et al
Ana Milena Situ, Cesar Rodriguez-Situ, Estate of Eugenio Rodriguez, D. D.C.R. and Estate of Laura Rodriguez Situ |
Jerome O'Neill, Jane Doe, Conjugal partnership O'Neill-Doe, Insurance Company ABC and Corporation DEF |
3:2011cv01225 |
February 28, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
San Juan Office |
San Juan |
Gustavo A. Gelpi |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 507 OPINION AND ORDER: DENIED 439 MOTION in Limine as to Expert Report and Testimony, 442 MOTION in Limine as to Economic Damages Expert. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 6/16/2016. (COL) |
Filing 413 ORDER: Denying 412 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 9/25/2015. (COL) |
Filing 396 OPINION AND ORDER: Denying 329 motion for summary judgment; Denying 332 motion for summary judgment. This case is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Marcos Lopez for the holding of a pre-trial-settlement conference. The parties should file a JOINT, proposed pre-trial memorandum. The conference and deadline for the joint filing shall be set by Magistrate Judge Lopez. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 8/25/2015. (MET) |
Filing 116 OPINION AND ORDER denying 90 Motion to Disqualify Defendants' Counsel. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Marcos E. Lopez on 10/25/2012. (GDR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.