Irizarry-Muniz et al v. Rivera-Nazario et al
| Jose Luis Irizarry-Muniz, Betsy Jeannette Perez-Rivera, Raixa Enid Irizarry-Perez, Minor K.J.I.P. and MInor X.D.I.P. |
| Jaime Rodriguez-Vega, Angel Torres-Quionez, Efrain Burgos-Montes, David Colon-Martinez, John Doe, Fulano de Tal and Eric Rivera-Nazario |
| 3:2011cv01337 |
| April 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| Yauco |
| Juan M Perez-Gimenez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
OPINION AND ORDER granting 14 Motion to Dismiss. Co-plaintiff Muniz's claims under the Eighth, Fourteenth and Fifth Amendments are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Co-Plaintiffs Muniz's claim under the Fourth Amendment is DISMISSED again st the moving co-defendants except Officer Torres Quinones. The Section 1983 claims brought on behalf of decedent Irizarry Perez are hereby also DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Therefore, the Court hereby orders that all claims against co-defendants Eric R ivera Nazario, Efrain Burgos Montes, David Colon and Jaime Rodrguez Vega be DISMISSED. Remaining before the Court is thus Muniz's Section 1983, Fourth Amendment claim against Officer Torres Quinones, as well as Plaintiffs' claims under Article 1802. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez-Gimenez on 8/3/2012. (PMA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
