Negron-Lopez v. Special Care Pharmacy Services, Inc.
Raiza Negron-Lopez |
Special Care Pharmacy Services, Inc. |
3:2011cv01664 |
July 11, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
San Juan Office |
San Juan |
Gustavo A. Gelpi |
Other Labor Litigation |
05 U.S.C. ยง 704 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 OPINION AND ORDER: Denying 24 Motion to Dismiss. Amended Complaint due by 4/2/2012. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 2/26/2012. (TC) Modified on 3/26/2012 as to title and to replace pdf as typo (er). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Negron-Lopez v. Special Care Pharmacy Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Special Care Pharmacy Services, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Raiza Negron-Lopez | |
Represented By: | Anibal Escanellas-Rivera |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.