B & B Target Center, Inc. et al v. Figueroa-Sancha et al
| B & B Target Center, Inc., Luis A. Bermudez-Gonzalez and Ana M. Latorre-Echeandia |
| Jose Figueroa-Sancha, Jose G. Camacho-Crespo, Raymond Ramos-Bajandas, Miguel Crespo-De-Leon, Arelys Serrano-Crespo, Carlos W. Carrion-Rodriguez, Juan C. Puig-Morales, Elba N. Vazquez-Ramos, Auberto Otero-Rivera, Officers 1 - 5 and Jim Roe |
| 3:2011cv01901 |
| September 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| Dorado |
| Francisco A. Besosa |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
OPINION AND ORDER re 18 Motion to Dismiss; 19 Motion to Dismiss; 22 Motion to Dismiss; 37 Motion to Dismiss. The Court GRANTS the defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' Fourth Amendment claim. The Court also DENIES the defe ndants' motion to dismiss with respect to the plaintiffs' Fourteenth Amendment, supervisory liability, direct liability, and failure to take remedial action claims. The Court grants the plaintiffs until July 9, 2012 to ame nd their pleading and substitute Figueroa and Puig (and any other defendant not currently in the position he or she was in when the complaint was filed) with their current successors. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 07/03/2012. (brc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
