Wirshing v. Banco Santander de Puerto Rico,et al
| Rose Marie Wirshing |
| Banco Santander de Puerto Rico, ABC Insurance Company, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 3:2011cv02073 |
| November 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| San Juan |
| Gustavo A. Gelpi |
| Labor/Management Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
ORDER: Granting in part and denying in part 139 Motion to Set Aside Verdict. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi (AS)
|
|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER: Denying 63 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 10/15/13. (CL) Modified on 10/16/2013 as to title (er).
|
|
Filing
59
OPINION AND ORDER: Finding as moot 57 Motion to Strike; denying 25 motion for summary judgment. This case is referred to Judge Velez-Rive for a settlement/pretrial conference as soon as possible. Judge Velez-Rive shall first hold a settlement/m ediation conference. If the case is not settled, the parties shall file a joint, pretrial memorandum by a deadline set by Judge Velez-Rive and Judge Velez- Rive will also schedule a pretrial conference. If the case is not settled, a trial date will be set for early 2014. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 8/28/13. (CL) Modified on 8/28/2013 as to name of Judge and title and Nunc Pro Tunc opinion replaced original per Court's Request er).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
