Casillas-Sanchez et al v. Ryder Memorial Hospital, Inc. et al
| John Casillas-Sanchez, Cleto Casillas-Sanchez, Rosa Esther Casillas-Sanchez, Rosa Maria Casillas-Sanchez, Juanita Casillas-Sanchez, Peter Casillas-Sanchez, Robert Richardson-Casillas and Paul Casillas-Sanchez |
| Ryder Memorial Hospital, Inc., Edgar A. Cardona-Traverzo, Conjugal Partnership Cardona-Doe, SIMED and John Doe |
| 3:2011cv02092 |
| November 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| San Juan |
| Francisco A. Besosa |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 147 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Defendants' second joint motion for judgment as a matter of law is DENIED. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 04/23/2014. (brc)
|
|
Filing
138
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 128 Motion for New Trial; and re 129 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Plaintiffs' motion for a new trial on damages, (Docket No. 128), is DENIED. Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law, (Docket No. 129), is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 03/04/2014. (brc)
|
|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 75 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction: GRANTED. The Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE plaintiffs' survivorship claim. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 07/30/2013. (brc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
