Rodriguez-Cortes v. Superintendencia del Capitolio et al
| Endel Rodriguez-Cortes |
| Superintendencia del Capitolio, The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Javier Vazquez, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Vazquez-Doe, John Roe, Jane Roe, Conjugal Partnership Roe-Roe and Insurance Companies A,B,C |
| 3:2015cv01535 |
| May 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| Manati |
| Jose A. Fuste |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
OPINION AND ORDER re 44 motion for summary judgment. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 02/17/2017. (brc)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and for Lack of Jurisdiction. Plaintiff's claims for money damages, including back pay, front pay, and punitive damages, against Defendant Vazquez in his official capacity and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (and the Superintendencia del Capitolio) are DISMISSED. Plaintiff Rodrguez's § 1983 claim against the Defendant Javier Vazquez in his personal capacity and any injunctive or declaratory relief sought against the Commonwealth Defendants and Defendant Vazquez in his official capacity, along with the state law claims, remain. Signed by Judge Jose A. Fuste on 11/12/2015. (mrj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
