Diaz-Calderon v. United States
| Ruth Diaz-Calderon |
| United States, Pablo Pantoja-Kunasek, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Pantoja-Doe, Waldemar Rivera-Quinones, Wilmy Feliciano, Conjugal Partnership Rivera-Feliciano, Ruben Fernandez-Vera, Dianna Pena, Conjugal Partnership Fernandez-Pena and John Doe |
| 3:2015cv02170 |
| August 25, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| Bayamon |
| Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
OPINION AND ORDER: Denying without prejudice 10 "Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction." In the interest of justice, the court will permit discovery limited to the scope-of-employment issue, which s hall conclude by August 23, 2016. Plaintiff will then have until September 23, 2016, to file if she deems it appropriate, a motion with specific evidence and authorities rebutting the scope-of-employment certification in this case. The government sh all respond by October 26, 2016. Replies and sur-replies will be allowed. They should be submitted without further court authorization not later than five (5) days after filing of the motion they are responding to (i.e. opposition or reply).Signed by Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez on 06/22/2016.(LMR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
