Parker Waichman LLP v. Salas LC et al
Plaintiff: Parker Waichman LLP
Defendant: Salas LC, Law Offices of John F. Nevares & Associates, PSC and Eric Quetglas-Jorgdan
Case Number: 3:2016cv01333
Filed: February 25, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Office: San Juan Office
County: Adjuntas
Presiding Judge: Salvador E. Casellas
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 309 OPINION AND ORDER denying 267 motion for summary judgment; denying 269 motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 8/12/2019. (grf)
May 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 227 OPINION AND ORDER re 182 Motion for Summary Judgment; re 188 Motion for Leave to File; re 197 Motion to Withdraw; re 198 Motion to Dismiss; and re 201 Motion to Strike. The defendants' motion to strike (Docket No. 201), the defendants ' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 182), Parker's motion to withdraw its request for a jury trial (Docket No. 197), and the defendants' motion for partial dismissal (Docket No. 198) are DENIED. Quetglas's motion requesting leave to file the amended crossclaim (Docket No. 188) is GRANTED. Quetglas may file the amended crossclaim no later than May 29, 2018. Nevares and Salas may file their answer no later than June 11, 2018. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 05/25/2018. (brc)
October 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 173 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 150 Motion for Reconsideration. Parker's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 10/12/2017. (brc)
July 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 142 OPINION AND ORDER re 125 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint is DENIED. Defendants' argument for dismissal based on plaintiff being a non-signatory to the CAPECO Agree ment is DENIED. Parker's specific performance claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and defendants' motion for dismissal on plaintiff's quantum meruit claim is DENIED. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 07/13/2017. (brc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parker Waichman LLP v. Salas LC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Parker Waichman LLP
Represented By: Richard Schell-Asad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Salas LC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Law Offices of John F. Nevares & Associates, PSC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Quetglas-Jorgdan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?