Principe v. M 2 M Global Corp et al
| Miguel Principe |
| M 2 M Global Corp, Traksecure Corp., Insight Managing Solutions Corp., Insight Technologies Corp., Insight Communications Corp., Victor Garcia Porrata and Neftali Bernard Rosado |
| 3:2017cv02262 |
| October 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| Guaynabo |
| Aida M. Delgado-Colon |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
OPINION AND ORDER re 17 MOTION to dismiss Counterclaim, 38 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, 40 MOTION for Extension of Time until July 24, 2018 to File Response/Reply, 41 MOTION requesting Order to Deem Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as Unopposed, 44 MOTION for Leave to File Spanish language documents, 45 MOTION to Strike, 47 MOTION for extension of time until August 20, 2018 to File Translated Documents, 48 MOTION Submitting Certif ied Translated Documents re: 44 . Principe's motion to dismiss the counterclaim, ECF No. 17, is DENIED. Olympic's motion for judgment on the pleadings, ECF NO. 38, is DENIED. Furthermore, ECF No. 40 is GRANTED, ECF No. 41 is DENIED, ECF No. 44 is GRANTED, ECF No. 45 is DENIED, ECF No. 47 is GRANTED, and ECF No. 48 is GRANTED. Signed by U.S. District Judge Aida M. Delgado-Colon on 9/28/2018.(wm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
