Wiscovitch-Barreras et al v. Cruz-Soto et al
| Jose A. Wiscovitch-Barreras, Rosario M. Castaneda-Casanova, Conjugal Partnership Wiscovitch-Casanova, Claudia Wiscovitch and Victoria Wiscovitch |
| Carmen Yulin Cruz-Soto, Rafael Gonzalez-Lopez, Samuel Perez-Barreto, The Municipality of San Juan, John Doe, Jane Doe and Insurance Company ABC |
| 3:2018cv01029 |
| January 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| San Juan |
| Carmen C. Cerezo |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
272
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum and Order, Defendant's Motion for Bill of Costs at Docket No. 268 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant is entitled to recover $3,767.65 in costs from Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 11/7/2022. (mrr)
|
|
Filing
184
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Co-Defendant Carmen Yulin Cruz Soto's Motion to Stay at Docket No. 180 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 4/5/2022. (mrr)
|
|
Filing
176
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in this Opinion and Order, the Magistrate Judge's 162 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED AS MODIFIED; Defendants' 105 and 107 Motions for Summary Judgment are granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 3/4/2022. (mrr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
