A.G.R.P et al v. Department of Education of Puerto Rico
| Leticia Pagan and A.G.R.P |
| Department of Education of Puerto Rico |
| 3:2018cv01710 |
| September 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Gustavo A Gelpi |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 USM Return of Summons Executed as to Dpeartment of Education-Hon. Julia Keleher, Secretary on 10/29/2018 (Attachments: #1 Summons Returned Executed) (gmm) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDERS: (1) DISCOVERY DISPUTES, (2) COURTESY COPIES, (3) DEPOSITIONS IN CIVIL CASES, (4) CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, (5) COMMUNICATIONS BY COUNSEL OR THEIR STAFF WITH JUDGE GELPI'S CHAMBERS' STAFF, (6) CODE OF CIVILITY.(rom) |
Filing 3
ORDER: The US Marshal shall serve summons. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 10/3/2018.(MET)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Department of Education of Puerto Rico. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (vdm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Education of Puerto Rico, filed by A.G.R.P, Leticia Pagan, Pro Se. (Filing fee receipt: PRX100058051, $400.00) Service due by 12/20/2018. (Attachments: #1 Category Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (gmm) Modified on 10/26/2018 to add payment information (gmm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
