Colon-Torres v. BBI Hospitality, Inc. et al
| Maria Colon-Torres |
| Jose Piraquet, Jane Doe, Corporation ABC, Insurance Company B, John Doe, Temistocles Ramirez de Arellano, Borinquen Beach Inn, Nelly King, Corporation XYZ, BBI Hospitality, Inc. and Insurance Company A |
| 3:2019cv01151 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Gustavo A Gelpi |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDERS: (1) DISCOVERY DISPUTES, (2) COURTESY COPIES, (3) DEPOSITIONS IN CIVIL CASES, (4) CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, (5) COMMUNICATIONS BY COUNSEL OR THEIR STAFF WITH JUDGE GELPI'S CHAMBERS' STAFF, (6) CODE OF CIVILITY. (gmm)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to BBI Hospitality, Inc., Borinquen Beach Inn, Nelly King, Jose Piraquet, Temistocles Ramirez de Arellano. (Attachments: #1 Summons in a Civil Action) (rim)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi. (rim)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number 0104-6273526.), filed by Maria Colon-Torres. Service due by 5/20/2019, (Attachments: #1 Category Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(Cobian-Roig, Manuel)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
