Santiago-Aviles v. Hernandez-Aviles et al
| Jose E Santiago-Aviles |
| Uriel Lasalle-Velazquez and Rafael Hernandez-Aviles |
| 3:2019cv02079 |
| November 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| William G Young |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Acces to Certified Statement filed by Jose E Santiago-Aviles, Pro se. Responses due by 12/26/2019. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Defective Filing, #2 Envelope)(gav) |
Filing 4
ORDER denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis "Whatever the merits of the plaintiff's in forma pauperis status, he has not paid the requisite filing fee and thus the Court reviews the complaint. It must be dismissed on claim preclusion grounds and because this Court has not subject matter jurisdiction to reexamine the criminal proceedings of the courts of the Commonwealth." Signed by Judge William G. Young on 11/25/2019. (EES)
|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Rafael Hernandez-Aviles, Uriel Lasalle-Velazquez, filed by Jose E Santiago-Aviles, Pro Se. Service due by 2/18/2020, (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
