Harms et al v. Mayaguez Medical Center Dr. Ramon Emeterio Betances, Inc. et al
JESSE HARMS and FRANKIE HARMS |
Mayaguez Medical Center Dr. Ramon Emeterio Betances, Inc., John Doe, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Nazario-Doe and Dr. Efrain Nazario |
3:2019cv02154 |
December 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Gustavo A Gelpi |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Mayaguez Medical Center Dr. Ramon Emeterio Betances, Inc., Efrain Nazario (Attachments: #1 Summons) (arg) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jesse Harms, Frankie Harms. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Davila-Diaz, Juan) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDERS: (1) DISCOVERY DISPUTES, (2) COURTESY COPIES, (3) DEPOSITIONS IN CIVIL CASES, (4) CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, (5) COMMUNICATIONS BY COUNSEL OR THEIR STAFF WITH JUDGE GELPI'S CHAMBERS' STAFF, (6) CODE OF CIVILITY. (gmm) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi (arg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe, Mayaguez Medical Center Dr. Ramon Emeterio Betances, Inc. ( Filing fee $400 receipt number 0104-6731159.), filed by JESSE HARMS, FRANKIE HARMS. Service due by 3/23/2020, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons, Cat Sheet, Civi Cover)(Davila-Diaz, Juan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.