Guerrero-Feliciano v. USA

Guerrero-Feliciano v. USA

Petitioner:	Hector Guerrero-Feliciano
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	3:2020cv01027
Filed:	January 21, 2020
Court:	US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Presiding Judge:	Carmen C Cerezo
Referring Judge:	Aida M Delgado-Colon
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
January 21, 2020	Filing 2 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) (Criminal Number 14-284-CCC-12) filed nunc pro tunc as of 12/02/19, by Hector Guerrero-Feliciano, pro se. Responses due by 2/4/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (xi)
January 21, 2020	Filing 1 COPY OF JUDGMENT of USCA as to Hector Guerrero-Feliciano (12) entered on 01/17/2020; Petitioner seeks leave to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion based on United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019), and related precedent. It appearing that petitioner never pursued a first 2255 motion in the district court, leave from this court is unnecessary. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(a), petitioner's application is TRANSFERRED to the district court for docketing as a first 2255 motion. The motion shall be deemed filed in the district court on the date petitioner's second or successive application was filed in this court. The court expresses no opinion as to the viability or merits of the claim set out in petitioner's application. (xi)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 21, 2020

Filing 2 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) (Criminal Number 14-284-CCC-12) filed nunc pro tunc as of 12/02/19, by Hector Guerrero-Feliciano, pro se. Responses due by 2/4/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (xi)

January 21, 2020

Filing 1 COPY OF JUDGMENT of USCA as to Hector Guerrero-Feliciano (12) entered on 01/17/2020; Petitioner seeks leave to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion based on United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019), and related precedent. It appearing that petitioner never pursued a first 2255 motion in the district court, leave from this court is unnecessary. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(a), petitioner's application is TRANSFERRED to the district court for docketing as a first 2255 motion. The motion shall be deemed filed in the district court on the date petitioner's second or successive application was filed in this court. The court expresses no opinion as to the viability or merits of the claim set out in petitioner's application. (xi)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guerrero-Feliciano v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Hector Guerrero-Feliciano
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?