Torres Diaz v. Hospital Doctors' Center San Juan, Inc et al
Mitchel Torres Diaz and Mitchel Torres-Diaz |
Corporation Z, Insurance Companies A, B, C and D, Corporation Y, Corporation X, Dr. Fulano, Jose Oller Lopez, Hospital Doctors' Center San Juan, Inc, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Oller-Doe, Unknown Corporations X, Y & Z and Jose R. Oller-Lopez |
3:2020cv01141 |
March 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Gustavo A Gelpi |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 STANDING ORDERS: (1) DISCOVERY DISPUTES, (2) COURTESY COPIES, (3) DEPOSITIONS IN CIVIL CASES, (4) CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, (5) COMMUNICATIONS BY COUNSEL OR THEIR STAFF WITH JUDGE GELPI'S CHAMBERS' STAFF, (6) CODE OF CIVILITY. (gmm) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Hospital Doctors' Center San Juan, Inc, Jose Oller Lopez (Attachments: #1 Summons) (arg) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi (arg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Dedendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number 0104-6830945.), filed by Mitchel Torres Diaz. Service due by 6/9/2020, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Rodriguez-Velez, Paul) Modified on 3/12/2020 to edit docket text (gmm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.