Buntin v. The Government of the State of Florida
| Fredrick Dee Buntin |
| The Government of the State of Florida |
| 3:2020cv01196 |
| April 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Jay A Garcia-Gregory |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Injunction filed by Fredrick Dee Buntin, pro se. Responses due by 7/7/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(mg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/29/2020: #2 Cover Letter) (mg). |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Temporary Injunction filed by Fredrick Dee Buntin, pro se. Responses due by 7/7/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(mg) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Expedite Order for Motions filed by Fredrick Dee Buntin, pro se. Responses due by 7/7/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (mg) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance and Request for Enlargement of Time to Comply with Order Issued at Docket 10 by Raul S. Mariani-Franco on behalf of Fredrick Dee Buntin (Mariani-Franco, Raul) |
| CJA 20: Appointment of Attorney Raul S. Mariani-Franco for Fredrick Dee Buntin. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 6/17/2020.(su) |
Filing 11
ORDER re 10 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Court finds that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3006A(a)(2)(B) and the provided financial information (and/or financial affidavit), the interest of justice requires that Petitioner be appointed counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 5/14/2020. (MQ)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Counsel shall confer with Plaintiff to review the legal requirements of the claims filed before this Court, and provide Plaintiff with an initial assessment of the viability of these claims and the pro se motions filed by Plaintiffs. Counsel shall file an amended complaint by 6/15/2020, and shall specify the basis for jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 5/13/2020. (MQ)
|
| Filing 9 INFORMATIVE Motion filed by Fredrick Dee Buntin, pro se. Responses due by 5/26/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Buntin v. The Government of the State of Florida | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Fredrick Dee Buntin | |
| Represented By: | Raul S. Mariani-Franco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Government of the State of Florida | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
