Baez-Eliza v. Departamento de la Familia et al
| Aneury Baez-Eliza |
| Jane Doe, Evelyn Velazquez-Vega, John Doe and Departamento de la Familia |
| 3:2020cv01219 |
| May 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Aida M Delgado-Colon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE PLEADING. Summons, Civil Cover Sheet (JS44), and Category sheet not included. (idg) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Aneury Baez-Eliza, pro se. Responses due by 5/22/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (idg) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Departamento de la Familia, Jane Doe, John Doe, Evelyn Velazquez-Vega filed by Aneury Baez-Eliza, pro se. Service due by 8/6/2020,(idg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to File Spanish language documents filed by Aneury Baez-Eliza, pro se. Responses due by 5/22/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (idg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Aneury Baez-Eliza, pro se. Responses due by 5/22/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (idg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
