Banco Popular de Puerto Rico v. Santiago-Salicrup
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
US Trustee and Chapter 13 Trustee |
Wanda I Santiago Salicrup and Wanda I. Santiago-Salicrup |
3:2020cv01361 |
July 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Aida M Delgado-Colon |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER re #4 Motion for extension of time. Granted. Appellants brief due by September 28, 2020. Signed by Judge Aida M. Delgado-Colon on 9/1/2020. (wm) Modified link on 9/2/2020 (idg). |
Filing 4 MOTION for extension of time until September 28, 2020 to File Appellant's Brief filed by Juan C. Salichs-Pou on behalf of Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Responses due by 9/14/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Salichs-Pou, Juan) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION for Transmittal of Complete Record on Appeal from Bankruptcy Court. Appellant Brief due by 9/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(acbk) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Aida M. Delgado-Colon (arg) |
Filing 1 TRANSMITTAL of Notice of Appeal from Bankruptcy Court, filed by Banco Popular de Puerto Rico. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal and Election to USDC, #2 Order dkt 68, #3 Certified Docket)(babk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.