Castro-Cruz v. Municipio Autonomo de Caguas et al
| Jesus Castro-Cruz |
| Natural and Environmental Resources Department, Jane Doe, Any Other ELA Agency, JOHN DOE, Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, Company A, B, C, Municipio Autonomo de Caguas, Director of Natural and Enviornmental Resources Department and William Miranda-Torres |
| 3:2020cv01394 |
| August 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Jay A Garcia-Gregory |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Any Other ELA Agency, Company A, B, C, Director of Natural and Enviornmental Resources Department, Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, JOHN DOE, Jane Doe, William Miranda-Torres, Municipio Autonomo de Caguas, Natural and Environmental Resources Department, filed by Jesus Castro-Cruz, Pro Se. Service due by 11/5/2020, (Attachments: #1 Category Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5).(mg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jesus Castro-Cruz, Pro Se. Responses due by 8/21/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (mg) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/11/2020) (mg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
