Vicenti-Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security
| William Vicenti-Sanchez |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2020cv01483 |
| September 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Marcos E Lopez |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OF THE CLERK: By Order of Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach (Docket No. 6), this case has been randomly assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Marcos E. Lopez for all further proceedings, including the entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). All future pleadings shall bear only the initials of the Magistrate Judge next to the case number: Civil Case No. 20-1483 (MEL). Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach is no longer assigned to this case. Signed by Clerk on 09/24/2020. (ft) |
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge: The Commissioner of Social Security has consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge in all cases involving judicial review of a final order denying disability benefits under the Social Security Act. Given plaintiff's consent (Docket No. #3 ), the case is referred to a U.S. Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings, including entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 9/24/2020. (mrr)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorneys Office, Social Security Administration & U.S. Department of Justice. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (arg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach (arg) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE by WILLIAM VICENTI SANCHEZ. (Torres-Velez, David) |
| Filing 2 ***FILED IN ERROR - Duplicate Filing as in D.E. #1 *** COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by WILLIAM VICENTI SANCHEZ. Service due by 12/17/2020, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(Torres-Velez, David) Modified on 9/18/2020 (rom). |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0104-7022822.), filed by William Vicenti-Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(Torres-Velez, David) Modified on 9/18/2020 to edit filer (rom). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vicenti-Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Vicenti-Sanchez | |
| Represented By: | David Luis Torres-Velez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
