Batiste v. CDM Federal Programs Corporation, et al
| Horace Batiste |
| CDM Federal Programs Corporation and CDM Smith, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv01497 |
| September 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| William G Young |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1938 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk re: #10 MOTION for Extension of Time until December 23, 2020 to File Answer (Stipulated) re: #1 Complaint, filed by Horace Batiste. ***FILED IN ERROR - Counsel shall re-file the motion with corrected signature on the Certificate of Service*** (rim) |
| Filing 10 ***FILED IN ERROR - Missing Signature Certificate of Service *** MOTION for Extension of Time until December 23, 2020 to File Answer (Stipulated) re: #1 Complaint, filed by Horace Batiste filed by Ricardo J. Prieto on behalf of Horace Batiste Responses due by 12/3/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Related document(s) #1 ) (Prieto, Ricardo) Modified on 11/20/2020 (rim). |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear PHV; granting #8 Motion to Appear PHV Signed by Judge William G. Young on 10/9/2020. (EES)
|
| Filing 8 Motion to allow Melinda Arbuckle to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $300 receipt number 0104-7044898) filed by Enrique J. Mendoza-Mendez on behalf of Horace Batiste Responses due by 10/22/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Mendoza-Mendez, Enrique) |
| Filing 7 Motion to allow Ricardo Prieto to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $300 receipt number 0104-7044878) filed by Enrique J. Mendoza-Mendez on behalf of Horace Batiste Responses due by 10/22/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Mendoza-Mendez, Enrique) Modified to edit docket text on 10/8/2020 (rim). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge William G. Young (arg) |
| Filing 5 First NOTICE of Filing Exhibits Category Sheet (Mendoza-Mendez, Enrique) |
| Filing 4 MOTION Submitting Plaintiff's Notice of Filing Consent Form filed by Enrique J. Mendoza-Mendez on behalf of Horace Batiste Responses due by 10/14/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Mendoza-Mendez, Enrique) |
| Filing 3 MOTION Submitting Waivers of Service of Summons filed by Enrique J. Mendoza-Mendez on behalf of Horace Batiste Responses due by 10/14/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement)(Mendoza-Mendez, Enrique) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING.Category sheet not included electronically pursuant to L.Civ.R. 3(a). Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 9/25/2020. (arg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CDM Federal Program Corporations and CDM Smith Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0104-7028361.), filed by Horace Batiste. Service due by 12/22/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Mendoza-Mendez, Enrique) Modified to change italics and edit docket text on 10/5/2020 (rim). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
