Maduro v. Garage Isla Verde, Inc.
Hector R. Maduro |
Garage Isla Verde, Inc. |
3:2020cv01543 |
October 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Pedro A Delgado-Hernandez |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER: Denying #5 "Motion Requesting Appointment of Counsel." Based on the financial affidavit submitted at Docket No. 5-1, plaintiff is not eligible for appointment of pro bono counsel. However, should a change in his circumstances occur, he may reapply for appointment of counsel under Local Rule 83L(h). With this in mind, plaintiff is granted until December 21, 2020, to announce legal representation. Should he choose not to secure counsel, he is warned that it is his responsibility to move the case forward, meet all deadlines, and comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this court. Signed by Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez on 12/2/2020. (MPL) |
Filing 4 ORDER: On October 16, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to submit, by November 6, 2020, a revised application to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 3). To date, he has not done so or asked for an extension to comply. He shall submit the revised application by December 9, 2020. Should he fail to comply by that date, he must pay the filing fee or face dismissal. Signed by Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez on 11/19/2020. (MPL) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Hector R. Maduro, Pro Se. Responses due by 11/13/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(rom) |
Filing 3 ORDER: Denying without prejudice #1 "Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs." Plaintiff shall submit a revised application to proceed in forma pauperis. He shall answer ALL questions included in the affidavit in support of the application. Plaintiff may find a copy of the application and the corresponding affidavit at www.prd.uscourts.gov/pro-se-forms, Section "Forms/Formularios." Notice of compliance due by November 6, 2020. Signed by Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez on 10/16/2020. (MPL) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Garage Isla Verde, Inc. filed by Hector R. Maduro, Pro Se. Service due by 1/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Category Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(rom) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Hector R. Maduro, Pro Se. Responses due by 10/23/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (rom) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Maduro v. Garage Isla Verde, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Garage Isla Verde, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Hector R. Maduro | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.