Ramos-Cruz v. Carrau-Martinez et al
Antonio Ramos-Cruz |
Eduardo J. Rivera-Juanatey, Ines Carrau-Martinez and Lorraine Martinez-Adorno |
3:2020cv01589 |
October 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Francisco A Besosa |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 USM Return of Summons Executed as to Ines Carrau Martinez on 12/17/2020 (gav) |
Filing 25 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Ines Carrau-Martinez served on 12/17/2020, answer due 1/7/2021. (gav) |
Filing 24 USM Return of Summons Executed as to Lorraine Martinez-Adorno on 12/17/2020 (gav) |
Filing 23 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Lorraine Martinez-Adorno served on 12/17/2020, answer due 1/7/2021. (gav) |
Filing 22 SUMMONS Issued as to Ines Carrau-Martinez and Lorraine Martinez-Adorno through the USMS, with copy of the order, complaint and USM-285. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (vdm) |
Filing 21 ORDER re #20 Motion for Issuance of Summons and Motion Submitting: GRANTED. The Clerk will issue the summons. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 12/14/2020. (brc) |
Filing 20 MOTION for Issuance of Summons and Service by United States Marshals as to Antonio Ramos-Cruz, MOTION Submitting Proposed Summons re: 19 Order on Motion requesting Order filed by Kevin E. Lerman on behalf of Antonio Ramos-Cruz Responses due by 12/28/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Respondents (Exhibit A))(Related document(s) 19 ) (Lerman, Kevin) |
Filing 19 ORDER re #17 Motion Requesting Order: GRANTED. Petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis. The United States Marshal shall serve process on Respondents. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 12/11/2020. (brc) |
Filing 18 ORDER re #16 Motion to Amend/Correct and Motion to Substitute Party: GRANTED. The case caption may be amended as requested, but the respondents must be served with process. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 12/11/2020. (brc) |
Filing 17 MOTION requesting Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Kevin E. Lerman on behalf of Antonio Ramos-Cruz Responses due by 12/28/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Lerman, Kevin) |
Filing 16 MOTION to Amend/Correct Case Caption, MOTION to Substitute Party filed by Kevin E. Lerman on behalf of Antonio Ramos-Cruz Responses due by 12/28/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Lerman, Kevin) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin E. Lerman on behalf of Antonio Ramos-Cruz (Lerman, Kevin) |
Filing 14 ORDER re #13 Motion to Appoint Counsel: GRANTED. The federal public defender is appointed to represent petitioner Antonio Ramos-Cruz. The Order at Docket No. 11 is vacated. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 12/02/2020. (brc) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Franco Lorenzo Perez-Redondo on behalf of Antonio Ramos-Cruz Responses due by 12/16/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Perez-Redondo, Franco) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Franco Lorenzo Perez-Redondo on behalf of Antonio Ramos-Cruz (Perez-Redondo, Franco) |
Filing 11 ***VACATED AS PER DOCKET 14 ORDER***ORDER re #9 Motion to Appoint Counsel: GRANTED. The Clerk will appoint counsel for plaintiff pursuant to Local Rule 83L. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 12/01/2020. (brc) Modified on 12/2/2020 (ab). |
Filing 10 **CASE PARTICIPANTS**AFFIDAVIT in Support of #5 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antonio Ramos-Cruz, Pro Se. (ab) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Antonio Ramos-Cruz, Pro Se. Responses due by 12/15/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (ab) |
Filing 8 ORDER re #6 Motion to Appoint Counsel: DENIED without prejudice. Once plaintiff files a properly filled out affidavit no later than November 30, 2020, his motion will be reconsidered. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 11/09/2020. (brc) |
Filing 7 ORDER re #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: DENIED without prejudice. The affidavit has not been properly filled out. Defendant will file a properly filled out affidavit no later than November 30, 2020, or this case will be dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 11/09/2020. (brc) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Antonio Ramos-Cruz, Pro Se. Responses due by 11/20/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (ab) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Antonio Ramos-Cruz, Pro Se. Responses due by 11/20/2020. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(ab) |
Filing 4 Amended APPLICATION of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254, filed by Antonio Ramos-Cruz, Pro Se. Service due by 2/4/2021,(ab) |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 11/18/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (ab) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Antonio Ramos-Cruz, Pro Se. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (ab) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254, filed by Antonio Ramos-Cruz, Pro Se. Service due by 1/25/2021. (ab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.