Rosa-Nales v. Televicentro of Puerto Rico, LLC et al
Pedro Rosa Nales and Pedro Rosa-Nales |
Dr. John Doe, ABC Insurance Company, Televicentro of Puerto Rico, LLC d/b/a WAPA TV- Canal 4, John Doe and Televicentro of Puerto Rico, LLC. doing business as WAPA TV- Canal 4 |
3:2020cv01700 |
December 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Raul M Arias-Marxuach |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 623 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Pedro Rosa-Nales.(Porro-Vizcarra, Manuel) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Myrmarie Laborde-Vega on behalf of Pedro Rosa Nales (Laborde-Vega, Myrmarie) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by Juan R. Gonzalez-Munoz on behalf of Pedro Rosa Nales . (Gonzalez-Munoz, Juan) Modified on 12/9/2020 to correct event and title (mcm). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Televicentro of Puerto Rico, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (arg) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach (arg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number 0104-7112295.), filed by Pedro Rosa Nales. Service due by 3/8/2021, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet Category Sheet, #3 Summons Summons)(Porro-Vizcarra, Manuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.