Burgos-Fonseca v. Commissioner of Social Security
Wigberto Burgos-Fonseca |
Commissioner of Social Security |
3:2021cv01027 |
January 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Marshal D Morgan |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER: Granted #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Marshal D. Morgan. (GDM) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OF THE CLERK: By Order of Judge Daniel R. Dominguez (Docket No. 7), this case has been randomly assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Marshal D. Morgan for final disposition, including entry of judgment as per 28 U.S.C. 636; Fed.R.Civ.P.73. All future pleadings shall bear only the initials of the Magistrate Judge next to the case number: Civil Case No. 21-1027 (MDM). Judge Daniel R. Dominguez is no longer assigned to this case. Signed by Clerk on 01/19/2021. (ft) |
Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge: Based upon the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636; Fed.R.Civ.P.73; and, the consent of the parties, this case is now referred to the Clerk to assign the instant matter to a Magistrate Judge at random, for final disposition including the entry of judgment. The Social Security Administration has consented to have all social security cases brought before the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has also consented to have this case brought before a Magistrate Judge at Docket No. #4 . Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 1/19/2021. (CBM) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Daniel R. Dominguez (arg) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Pedro G. Cruz-Sanchez on behalf of Wigberto Burgos-Fonseca (Cruz-Sanchez, Pedro) |
Filing 4 CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Wigberto Burgos-Fonseca. (Cruz-Sanchez, Pedro) |
Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Wigberto Burgos-Fonseca. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Category Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(Cruz-Sanchez, Pedro) |
Filing 2 **SELECTED PARTY** FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Wigberto Burgos-Fonseca. (Cruz-Sanchez, Pedro) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Pedro G. Cruz-Sanchez on behalf of Wigberto Burgos-Fonseca Responses due by 2/1/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Cruz-Sanchez, Pedro) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Burgos-Fonseca v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Wigberto Burgos-Fonseca | |
Represented By: | Pedro G. Cruz-Sanchez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.