Perez-Marquez v. Puerto Rico Department of Treasury
Plaintiff: Willie Ivan Perez-Marquez
Defendant: Puerto Rico Department of Treasury
Case Number: 3:2021cv01095
Filed: February 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Presiding Judge: Gustavo A Gelpi
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Noting #5 Informative Letter (in Spanish containing personal ID info) re: fraud allegations, Pro Se, and addressed to U.S. Attorney's Office. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 3/30/2021. (MES)
March 26, 2021 Filing 5 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** INFORMATIVE Letter (In the Spanish Language containing personal ID information) regarding fraud allegations filed by Willie Ivan Perez-Marquez, Pro Se. Addressed to US Attorney's Office. Responses due by 4/9/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit of first Complaint, #3 Exhibit of Court Notice, #4 Envelope).(mg)
March 5, 2021 Filing 4 JUDGMENT is hereby entered DISMISSING Plaintiff's claims. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 3/5/2021. (CRH)
March 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Mr. Perez-Marquez, a Commonwealth inmate, has submitted a letter asking that the Court to investigate allegedly fraudulent use of his identity for purposes of federal benefits. Inasmuch as this matter does not present a cognizable case and controversy under Article III of the Constitution, the matter must be DISMISSED as a civil case. However, the Clerk of Court will transmit copy of this order and the underlying letter to the US Attorney's Office for any appropriate action. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 3/5/2021. (CRH)
March 4, 2021 Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING. Pleading or document is not in the English language and plaintiff has not moved for permission to file pleading in the Spanish language. LCiv.R. 5. Prose pleading is not in the form prescribed by U.S. District Court for such action, or in a format substantially conforming thereto. L.Civ.R. 3(c). Plaintiff's request to proceed without prepayment of fees does not comply with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 1915 and L.Civ. Rs. 3.1 (a), (b)(2) and (c)(4). Other: Plaintiff did not submit, cover sheets nor category sheets. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 3/24/2021. (rim)
February 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Puerto Rico Department of Treasury, filed by Willie Ivan Perez-Marquez, pro se. Service due by 5/24/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rim) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/4/2021: #2 Unredacted Complaint) (rim).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perez-Marquez v. Puerto Rico Department of Treasury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Puerto Rico Department of Treasury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie Ivan Perez-Marquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?