Batista v. Condominio San Jacinto
| Priscilla Batista |
| Condominio San Jacinto |
| 3:2021cv01150 |
| April 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Jay A Garcia-Gregory |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for extension of time; granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 06/04/2021. (lir)
|
| Filing 8 First MOTION for extension of time, First MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Yasmin M. Santiago-Zayas on behalf of Priscilla Batista Responses due by 6/7/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Santiago-Zayas, Yasmin) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to why Plaintiff's appointed counsel has failed to comply with this Court's Orders. See Docket Nos. 4; 6. Show Cause Response due by 5/24/2021. Failure to comply may result in the imposition of sanctions. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 5/19/2021. (MQ)
|
|
Filing 6
STATUS REPORT ORDER. Status Report due by 5/10/2021. See also Docket No. 4. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 5/4/2021. (MQ)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appointment of Counsel of Attorney Yasmin M. Santiago-Zayas for Priscilla Batista re 4 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Clerk on 4/9/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notification in the Spanish language) (mcm) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Counsel shall confer with Plaintiff and file an amended complaint in the English language. See 48 U.S.C. 864; Local Civil Rule 5(g). Amended Pleadings due by 5/3/2021. Failure to comply may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 4/9/2021. (MQ)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Priscilla Batista, Pro se. Responses due by 4/20/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (gav) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/6/2021: #1 Affidavit) (gav). |
| Filing 2 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Priscilla Batista, Pro se Responses due by 4/20/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (gav) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Condominio San Jacinto, filed by Priscilla Batista, Pro se. Service due by 7/6/2021, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet)(gav) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Batista v. Condominio San Jacinto | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Condominio San Jacinto | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Priscilla Batista | |
| Represented By: | Yasmin M. Santiago-Zayas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
