Bonilla-Albarran v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
| Wilvia Marie Bonilla-Albarran |
| Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney's Office District of Puerto Rico and United States of America |
| 3:2021cv01185 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Raul M Arias-Marxuach |
| Marcos E Lopez |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OF THE CLERK: By Order of Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach (Docket No. 5), this case has been randomly assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Marcos E. Lopez for all further proceedings, including entry of judgment. All future pleadings shall bear only the initials of the Magistrate Judge next to the case number: Civil Case No. 21-1185 (MEL). Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach is no longer assigned to this case. Signed by Clerk on 05/20/2021. (ft) |
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge: re 4 consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. On 4/27/2021, the Court ordered the Plaintiff to inform, no later than 5/11/2021, whether she would consent to have a Magistrate Judge handle the proceedings in this case, to include the entry of judgment. Failure to do so would be considered implicit consent. Id. Plaintiff failed to do so. Accordingly, this case is referred to a U.S. Magistrate Judge for all proceedings, including the entry of judgment. Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 5/20/2021.(mrr)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: The Court reminds the parties that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C.A. 636(c). The Social Security Administration has consented to have all social security cases brought before a Magistrate Judge. This procedure could prove to be more expeditious, and therefore, less expensive, than a trial before a District Judge. The Plaintiff is, of course, also free "to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences." Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2). The Plaintiff is advised, however, that the increase in the Court's criminal docket may impede a reasonably timely disposition of this case. Hence, The Court hereby orders the Plaintiff to affirmatively state whether or not she consents to having the instant matter be entertained before a U.S. Magistrate Judge through the entry of judgment and her rationale underlying her decision on or before May 11, 2021. Failure to respond to this Order will be treated as an implied consent by the Plaintiff. The Court notes that the Magistrate Judges in the District of Puerto Rico are first-rate jurists with impeccable legal minds, integrity and judicial temperament. The Plaintiff should thus carefully consider the merits of consenting to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 4/27/2021. (mrr)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 4/27/2021. (mrr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
