R.J. Alan Company, Inc. v Mayaguez Economic Development Inc.
R.J. Alan Company, Inc. |
Mayaguez Economic Development Inc. |
Municipality of Mayaguez |
3:2021cv01314 |
July 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Jay A Garcia-Gregory |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
12 U.S.C. § 1819 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance filed by Berenice B. Bellotti on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Responses due by 9/14/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Bellotti, Berenice) Modified on 9/1/2021 to modify event, document is not a motion (gav). |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Alberto Rodriguez-Ramos on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Rodriguez-Ramos, Alberto) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion filed by Municipality of Mayaguez Re: #17 Objection to filed by R.J. Alan Company, Inc. filed by Municipality of Mayaguez. (Aldarondo-Lopez, Eliezer) |
Filing 17 OBJECTION filed by All Plaintiffs Re: #13 MOTION to Intervene filed by Municipality of Mayaguez, #14 Notice of Filing Exhibits filed by Municipality of Mayaguez filed by All Plaintiffs. (Perez-Caldera, Carla) |
Filing 16 Notice of Appearance filed by Carla S. Perez-Caldera on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Responses due by 9/13/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Perez-Caldera, Carla) Modified on 8/31/2021 to edit event title (mcm). |
Filing 15 MOTION to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as to Mayaguez Economic Development Inc. filed by Lucas A. Cordova-Ayuso on behalf of Mayaguez Economic Development Inc. Responses due by 9/10/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Cordova-Ayuso, Lucas) Modified on 8/30/2021 to remove italics (gav). |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Filing Exhibits re #13 MOTION to Intervene filed by Municipality of Mayaguez (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 7) (Aldarondo-Lopez, Eliezer) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Intervene filed by Eliezer Alberto Aldarondo-Lopez on behalf of Municipality of Mayaguez Responses due by 8/31/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 MEMORANDUM OF LAW AND RESPONSIVE PLEADING, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7)(Aldarondo-Lopez, Eliezer) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 08/17/2021. (lir) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #8 MOTION to Amend/Correct re: #6 Response in Opposition to Motion. Amended Response due by 8/20/2021. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 8/16/2021. (MQ) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed Mayaguez Economic Development, Inc. by R.J. Alan Company, Inc. upon Mayaguez Economic Development Inc. served on 8/6/2021, answer due 8/27/2021. (Sanchez-Betances, Luis) Modified on 8/10/2021 to remove italics (gav). |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Sergio Sanchez-Pagan on behalf of R.J. Alan Company, Inc. (Sanchez-Pagan, Sergio) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Amend/Correct Re: #6 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by R.J. Alan Company, Inc. filed by Luis Sanchez-Betances on behalf of R.J. Alan Company, Inc. Responses due by 8/16/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Related document(s) #6 ) (Sanchez-Betances, Luis) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Quash Service of Summons and Reply to Opposition to Enlargement of Time filed by Lucas A. Cordova-Ayuso on behalf of Mayaguez Economic Development Inc. Responses due by 8/16/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Cordova-Ayuso, Lucas) Modified on 8/3/2021 to remove italics (gav). |
Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time to Answer filed by R.J. Alan Company, Inc. Re: #5 First MOTION for Extension of Time until September 3, 2021 to File Answer to Complaint or otherwise plead pursuant to L. Civ. R. 6 filed by Mayaguez Economic Development Inc. filed by R.J. Alan Company, Inc.. (Sanchez-Betances, Luis) Modified on 7/29/2021 to remove italics (gav). |
Filing 5 First MOTION for Extension of Time until September 3, 2021 to File Answer to Complaint or otherwise plead pursuant to L. Civ. R. 6 filed by Lucas A. Cordova-Ayuso on behalf of Mayaguez Economic Development Inc. Responses due by 8/11/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Cordova-Ayuso, Lucas) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by R.J. Alan Company, Inc. upon Mayaguez Economic Development Inc. served on 7/14/2021, answer due 8/4/2021. (Sanchez-Betances, Luis) Modified on 7/15/2021 to edit text (gav). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Mayaguez Economic Development Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (arg) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory (arg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Collection of Money, Mortgage Foreclosure against Mayaguez Economic Development Inc. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number 0104-7364329.), filed by R.J. Alan Company, Inc.. Service due by 10/4/2021, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Mortgage Note, #2 Exhibit Deed No. 10, #3 Exhibit Forbearance Agreement, #4 Exhibit Collateral Assignment, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Category Sheet, #7 Summons)(Sanchez-Betances, Luis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.