Collazo-Berrios v. Preferred Home Services, Inc.
| Georgina Collazo Berrios through her attorney in fact, Luis Vega Collazo and Georgina Collazo-Berrios |
| Preferred Home Services, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv01500 |
| October 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Raul M Arias-Marxuach |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER noted #4 Informative motion regarding request for waiver of service of summons. Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 11/8/2021. (mrr)
|
| Filing 4 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding request for waiver of service of summons filed by William Rivera-Velez on behalf of Georgina Collazo-Berrios Responses due by 11/16/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Rivera-Velez, William) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Preferred Home Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (arg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach (arg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Preferred Home Services, Inc., filed by Georgina Collazo Berrios through her attorney in fact, Luis Vega Collazo. Service due by 1/14/2022, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Summons)(Rivera-Velez, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
