Mirabal-Pargas et al v. DCF Exchange, LLC et al
| Carlos Mirabal-Pargas, Aida Mirabal-Delgado and Conjugal Partnership Mirabal-Mirabal |
| DCF Exchange, LLC, Nathaniel M. Pulsifier, Jane Doe 1, Conjugal Partnership Pulsifier-Doe 1, Ross Pearlstone, Jane Doe 2, Conjugal Partnership Pearlstone-Doe 2, Unknown Members of the Board of Directors of DFC Exchange, LLC, Impact Deposits Corporation, Samuel Segui, Jane Doe 3, Conjugal Partnership Segui-Doe 3, Unknown Members of the Board of Directors of IDC and Unknown Insurance Companies |
| 3:2021cv01544 |
| November 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Jay A Garcia-Gregory |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER noted #14 INFORMATIVE motion; granting #15 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Elisa M. Alcaraz-Emmanuelli is hereby terminated from the case. Plaintiffs shall make a diligent attempt to retain an attorney on a contingent fee arrangement. Only if that attempt proves unsuccesful may Plaintiffs seek further assistance from the Court. Counsel Alcaraz-Emmanuelli shall provide a copy and an explanation of this Order to Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 7/22/2022. (MQ)
|
| Filing 15 Second MOTION to Withdraw Attorney filed by Elisa M. Alcaraz-Emmanuelli on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Responses due by 4/4/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Alcaraz-Emmanuelli, Elisa) Modified on 3/22/2022 to remove italics (gav). |
| Filing 14 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Counsel Withdrawal and Case Amendment Date filed by Aida Mirabal-Delgado, Carlos Mirabal-Pargas, Pro se. Responses due by 3/29/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (gav) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER denying #12 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. While the terms of the contract may be complex, Plaintiffs allege a simple breach of contract claim and counsel can become competent in the specific issues raised. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 3/3/2022. (MQ)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Withdraw Attorney as to Elisa M. Alcaraz-Emmanuelli filed by Elisa M. Alcaraz-Emmanuelli on behalf of All Plaintiffs Responses due by 3/17/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Alcaraz-Emmanuelli, Elisa) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER noted #5 INFORMATIVE motion. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 2/8/2022. (lir)
|
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Conjugal Partnership Pearlstone-Doe 2, Conjugal Partnership Pulsifier-Doe 1, Conjugal Partnership Segui-Doe 3, DCF Exchange, LLC, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, Impact Deposits Corporation, Ross Pearlstone, Nathaniel M. Pulsifier, Samuel Segui, Unknown Insurance Companies, Unknown Members of the Board of Directors of DFC Exchange, LLC, Unknown Members of the Board of Directors of IDC through the USM Marshals with copy of Order, copy of Complaint and USM 285 (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 USM 285) (ad) |
|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL PRO BONO. Attorney Elisa M. Alcaraz-Emmanuelli to represent Carlos Mirabal-Pargas, Aida Mirabal-Delgado and Conjugal Partnership Mirabal-Mirabal re 7 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 1/31/2022. (Attachments: #1 Spanish Language)(ecc)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing Exhibits - Summons - by Carlos Mirabal-Pargas, Pro se, re #2 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (gav) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Clerk of Court shall take notice. Appointed counsel shall confer with Plaintiff and submit an amended complaint, specifying the basis for federal jurisdiction and the causes of action asserted. Amended Pleadings due by 3/28/2022. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 1/31/2022. (MQ)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The U.S. Marshals shall serve process upon Defendants accordingly. Service of process due in 60 days. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 1/31/2022. (MQ)
|
| Filing 5 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Damages filed by Aida Mirabal-Delgado, Carlos Mirabal-Pargas, Pro se. Responses due by 1/5/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8)(gav) |
| Filing 4 **SELECTED PARTY** FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT in Support of Motion Requesting Appointment of Counsel by Conjugal Partnership Mirabal-Mirabal, Aida Mirabal-Delgado, Carlos Mirabal-Pargas, pro se. (idg) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by All Plaintiffs, pro se. Responses due by 11/30/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (idg) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Aida Mirabal-Delgado, Carlos Mirabal-Pargas, Conjugal Partnership Mirabal-Mirabal, pro se. Service due by 2/14/2022, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Category Sheet)(idg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by All Plaintiffs, pro se. Responses due by 11/30/2021. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (idg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/22/2021: #1 Affidavit) (idg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
