Santiago-Santiago v. State Insurance Fund Co.
| IVONNE Y SANTIAGO-SANTIAGO, FELIX ROSA-RODRIGUEZ and LEGAL SOCIETY OF EARNINGS |
| STATE INSURANCE FUND CO., Jess M Rodrguez-Rosa, John Doe and Jesus M. Rodriguez-Rosa |
| 3:2021cv01610 |
| December 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Jay A Garcia-Gregory |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory (arg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Exhibits Civil Cover Sheet, Category Sheet re #1 Complaint filed by Ivonne Santiago-Santiago, Legal Society of Earnings, Felix Rosa-Rodriguez(Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Rodriguez-Lopez, Juan) Modified on 12/23/2021 to remove all caps (gav). |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING.Civil Cover Sheet (JS44), and Category sheet not included electronically pursuant to L.Civ.R. 3(a). Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 12/20/2021. (arg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number APRDC-7571408.), filed by Ivonne Santiago-Santiago, Legal Society of Earnings, Felix Rosa-Rodriguez. Service due by 3/16/2022,(Rodriguez-Lopez, Juan) Modified on 12/23/2021 to remove all caps (gav). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
