Integrative Clinical Trials LLC v. Romark Global Pharma LLC
| Integrative Clinical Trials LLC |
| Romark Global Pharma LLC |
| 3:2022cv01007 |
| January 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Pedro A Delgado-Hernandez |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Romark Global Pharma LLC. (mcm) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Granting in part #6 "Request to Enter Default and Default Judgment Against Romark Global Pharma, LLC." The Clerk shall enter default against Romark Global Pharma, LLC. Signed by Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez on 3/3/2022. (LM)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Default Entry as to Romark Global Pharma LLC, MOTION for Default Judgment as to Romark Global Pharma LLC filed by Solymar Castillo-Morales on behalf of Integrative Clinical Trials LLC Responses due by 3/16/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Unsworn Statement Under Penalty of Perjury - Dr. Michael Yuryev, #2 Text of Proposed Order B - Proposed Order)(Castillo-Morales, Solymar) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Integrative Clinical Trials LLC upon Romark Global Pharma LLC served on 1/18/2022, answer due 2/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Castillo-Morales, Solymar) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement byIntegrative Clinical Trials LLC. (Castillo-Morales, Solymar) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Romark Global Pharma LLC (Attachments: #1 Summons) (arg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez (arg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Romark Global Pharma LLC ( Filing fee $402 receipt number APRDC-7589049.), filed by Integrative Clinical Trials LLC. Service due by 4/5/2022, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Clinical Trial Agreement Protocol RM08-3008, #2 Exhibit 2 Enrollment Log Protocol RM08-3008, #3 Exhibit 3- Invoices, #4 Exhibit 4- Email - Instructions and Collection Efforts, #5 Exhibit 5- Email - Collection Efforts, #6 Exhibit 6- Email - Collection Efforts, #7 Exhibit 7 - Email - Collection Efforts, #8 Exhibit 8 - Open Balance Account and Pre Judgment Interest up to December 30, 2021, #9 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Category Sheet Category Sheet, #11 Summons Summons)(Castillo-Morales, Solymar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Integrative Clinical Trials LLC v. Romark Global Pharma LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Integrative Clinical Trials LLC | |
| Represented By: | Solymar Castillo-Morales |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Romark Global Pharma LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
