Harmon et al v. Autonomous Municipality of San Juan et al
Tamika Harmon and Kiya Jefferson |
Autonomous Municipality of San Juan and Optima Seguros |
3:2022cv01036 |
January 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Jay A Garcia-Gregory |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk re: 11 Order on Motion for Entry of Default,, Order on Motion to Withdraw Document,. ***STRICKEN AS PER ORDER AT D.E. #11*** (gav) |
Filing 11 ORDER striking #8 Motion for Entry of Default; granting #9 Motion to Withdraw Document #8 MOTION for Default Entry as to Autonomous Municipality of San Juan, #9 MOTION to Withdraw Document re: #8 MOTION for Default Entry as to Autonomous Municipality of San Juan filed by Tamika Harmon, Kiya Jefferson. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 03/03/2022. (lir) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to the Complaint or Otherwise Plead filed by Autonomous Municipality of San Juan, Optima Seguros, #7 INFORMATIVE Motion filed by Optima Seguros; noted #7 INFORMATIVE motion. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 03/03/2022. (lir) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Withdraw Document re: #8 MOTION for Default Entry as to Autonomous Municipality of San Juan filed by Tamika Harmon, Kiya Jefferson filed by Alberto J. Castaner-Padro, III on behalf of All Plaintiffs Responses due by 3/15/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Castaner-Padro, Alberto) |
Filing 8 ***STRICKEN AS PER ORDER AT D.E. #11*** MOTION for Default Entry as to Autonomous Municipality of San Juan filed by Alberto J. Castaner-Padro, III on behalf of Tamika Harmon, Kiya Jefferson Responses due by 3/15/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Castaner-Padro, Alberto) Modified on 3/4/2022 (gav). |
Filing 7 INFORMATIVE Motion filed by Lemuel Cancel-Mendez on behalf of Optima Seguros Responses due by 3/3/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Cancel-Mendez, Lemuel) |
Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time until March 21, 2022 to File Answer to the Complaint or Otherwise Plead filed by Lemuel Cancel-Mendez on behalf of All Defendants Responses due by 3/3/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Cancel-Mendez, Lemuel) Modified on 2/18/2022 to remove italics (gav). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs upon Optima Seguros served on 1/27/2022, answer due 2/17/2022. (Castaner-Padro, Alberto) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs upon Autonomous Municipality of San Juan served on 1/27/2022, answer due 2/17/2022. (Castaner-Padro, Alberto) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Autonomous Municipality of San Juan, Optima Seguros (Attachments: #1 Summons) (arg) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory (arg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number APRDC-7605618.), filed by Tamika Harmon, Kiya Jefferson. Service due by 4/20/2022, (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Category Sheet)(Castaner-Padro, Alberto) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.