United States of America v. To Go Stores, LLC
| United States of America |
| To Go Stores, LLC |
| 3:2022cv01038 |
| January 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Daniel R Dominguez |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 6901 Resource & Recovery Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
CONSENT JUDGMENT. Pursuant to Plaintiff, United States of America, on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Motion to enter Proposed Consent Decree (Docket No. 5) and the parties, United States of America and To Go Stores, LLC, Proposed Consent Decree (Docket No. 2-1), and the Courts Order approving the same IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 1.All terms and conditions of the Consent Decree are incorporated herein by reference. See Docket No. 2, Exhibit 1. 2.The appearing parties expressly agree that the Judgment will be deemed final and enforceable as of the date it is entered by the Court. 3.The Court shall retain jurisdiction as to the enforcement of the Settlement Agreement. 4.Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys fees. THIS CASE IS NOW CLOSED FOR ALL ADMINISTRATIVE AND STATISTICAL PURPOSES.IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED. Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 3/7/2022. (CBM)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Approve Consent Judgment. The Court reviewed and accepts the Consent Decree proposed by the parties. Judgment is to be entered forthwith pursuant to the terms contained therein. Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 3/7/2022. (CBM)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment filed by Natalie G. Harrison on behalf of United States of America Responses due by 3/18/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Harrison, Natalie) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER RE: CODE OF CIVILITY.Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 8/4/2017.(gav)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Daniel R. Dominguez (arg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Proposed Consent Decree) (Harrison, Natalie) Modified on 1/24/2022 to remove italics (gav). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against To Go Stores, LLC, filed by United States of America. Service due by 4/21/2022, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet)(Harrison, Natalie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. To Go Stores, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Natalie G. Harrison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: To Go Stores, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
