Rivera-Pedrogo v. Villamil-Wiscovitch
| Mr. Juan Carlos Rivera-Pedrogo |
| Dr. Fernando L. Villamil-Wiscovitch |
| 3:2022cv01039 |
| January 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Francisco A Besosa |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER re #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: GRANTED, but answer deadline is extended only until April 4, 2022. Default has already been entered against Dr. Villamil-Wiscovitch. Signed by Senior Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 03/22/2022. (brc)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint, filed by Juan Carlos Rivera-Pedrogo filed by Jose A. Gonzalez-Villamil on behalf of Fernando L. Villamil-Wiscovitch Responses due by 4/5/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Gonzalez-Villamil, Jose)
|
|
Filing 7
Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Fernando L. Villamil-Wiscovitch (ab)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER re #5 Motion for Default Judgment: DENIED, but the Clerk will enter default as to defendant Villamil-Wiscovitch. Plaintiff will move for default judgment no later than April 4, 2022. Signed by Senior Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 03/21/2022. (brc)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Default Judgment as to Fernando L. Villamil-Wiscovitch filed by Jose F. Velazquez-Ortiz on behalf of Juan Carlos Rivera-Pedrogo Responses due by 4/4/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Velazquez-Ortiz, Jose)
|
|
Filing 4
AFFIDAVIT of Service by Juan Carlos Rivera-Pedrogo upon Fernando L. Villamil-Wiscovitch served on 2/18/2022, answer due 3/11/2022. (Velazquez-Ortiz, Jose)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Fernando L. Villamil-Wiscovitch (Attachments: #1 Summons) (arg)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Senior Judge Francisco A. Besosa (arg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Fernando L. Villamil-Wiscovitch ( Filing fee $402 receipt number APRDC-7608823.), filed by Juan Carlos Rivera-Pedrogo. Service due by 4/25/2022, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Supplement, #2 Category Sheet Supplement, #3 Summons Proposed summons)(Velazquez-Ortiz, Jose)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rivera-Pedrogo v. Villamil-Wiscovitch | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mr. Juan Carlos Rivera-Pedrogo | |
| Represented By: | Jose F. Velazquez-Ortiz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dr. Fernando L. Villamil-Wiscovitch | |
| Represented By: | Jose A. Gonzalez-Villamil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
