Contreras et al v. Cabrera et al
| William Contreras and Linda Contreras |
| Puerto Rico Department of Health, Puerto Rico Department of Housing, Mario Alberto Cabrera, US Department Of Health And Human Resources, Departamento de la Salud de Puerto Rico, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Departamento de la Vivienda de Puerto Rico, Wilmary Nieves-Lopez, Waleska Maldonado-Claudio, Ashira E. Rosario, Vanessa Rosado-Romero, Cheyra Ortiz-Otero and Marcos A. Molina-Vega |
| 3:2022cv01157 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Raul M Arias-Marxuach |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appointment of Counsel Ana Maria Cordero-Varela to represent Linda Contreras and William Contreras re 13 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion to Restrict. Signed by Clerk on 5/4/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appointment in Spanish Language) (rim) |
Filing 14
ORDER re: #12 Motion to Amend Original Complaint. Held in abeyance. This is a matter that should be discussed with substitute pro-bono counsel which will be promptly appointed. Proceedings shall be stayed for 30 days from the appointment of pro-bono counsel as provided in Local 83 (m). Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 04/29/2022. NEF notified to William Contreras, Pro se. (ft)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER re: #10 Motion Requesting Relief from an Order of Appointment and #11 Motion to Restrict Document at Docket No. 10. Granted. Attorney Frances Pesquera-Rivera withdrawn from the case. The Clerk of the Court will appoint substitute pro-bono counsel. Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 04/29/2022. (ft) Modified on 4/29/2022 to edit docket text. (ft).
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Restrict Document at Docket No. 10 filed by Frances R. Pesquera-Rivera on behalf of Linda Contreras, William Contreras Responses due by 5/10/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Pesquera-Rivera, Frances) |
| NOTICE to Counsel by Deputy Clerk re: #10 "Application for Relief..." Attorney Pesquera-Rivera is notified of the requisite to file a Motion to Restrict in compliance with the Standing Order No. 9 filed in Misc. 03-149(ADC). Motion to Restrict to be filed. (mcm) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Amend Original Complaint filed by William Contreras, Pro se. Responses due by 5/9/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Subpoenas)(gav) |
| Filing 10 ***EX-PARTE*** MOTION Requesting Relief from an Order of Appointment re #8 Order,, Add and Terminate Attorneys, filed by Frances R. Pesquera-Rivera on behalf of Linda Contreras, William Contreras Responses due by 5/9/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Pesquera-Rivera, Frances) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Mario Alberto Cabrera, Waleska Maldonado-Claudio, Marcos A. Molina-Vega, Wilmary Nieves-Lopez, Cheyra Ortiz-Otero, Puerto Rico Department of Health, Puerto Rico Department of Housing, Vanessa Rosado-Romero, Ashira E. Rosario, US Department Of Health And Human Resources, US Department of Housing and Urban Development through the US Marshals with copy of Order, copy of Complaint and USM 285 (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 USM 285) (ad) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appointment of Counsel of Attorney Frances R. Pesquera-Rivera to represent Linda Contreras and William Contreras re 7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Order on Motion Submitting. Signed by Clerk on 4/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notification in the Spanish language) (mcm) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Having reviewed the pleadings and the factors in Local Rule 83I, the Court concludes that the matter could be complex and that the interests of justice will be served by appointment of pro-bono counsel. Accordingly, The Clerk of the Court shall appoint pro-bono counsel to represent plaintiffs at no cost to them; noted #3 Motion submitting Related document; noted #5 Motion Submitting Page 23 of the Complaint; noted and denied #6 Motion Submitting Subpoena. No discovery can be had in a civil case until a Rule 26(f) discovery planning conference is held. Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 4/18/2022. (mrr)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION Submitting Subpoena filed by William Contreras, pro se. Responses due by 4/20/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Subpoena)(rim) |
| Filing 5 MOTION Submitting Page 23 of the Complaint re: #1 Complaint,, filed by Linda Contreras, William Contreras filed by All Plaintiffs, pro se. Responses due by 4/20/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Page 23 of the Complaint)(Related document(s) #1 ) (rim) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANT: The Clerk's Office has received your Complaint. A new case has been opened and assigned to Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerk's Office concerning your case must include the case number: 3:22-cv-01157-RAM. All documents for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and dark enough for scanning. The Court enforces its rules and expects compliance with all directives; failure to comply with a court rule, federal law, or court directive may result in dismissal. The plaintiff must also keep the Court informed of any address changes. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned undelivered, the case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (rim) |
| Filing 3 MOTION Submitting Exhibits re: #1 Complaint, filed by All Plaintiffs; filed by William Contreras, pro se. Responses due by 4/18/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Property Deed, #2 Bill of Sale, #3 Property Report, #4 Department of Health Evidence of being Stigmatized, #5 Home Ownership Program)(Related document(s) #1 ) (rim) |
| Filing 2 ***SELECTED PARTIES***APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by All Plaintiffs, pro se. Responses due by 4/18/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(rim) |
| Filing 1 **CASE PARTICIPANTS** COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Linda Contreras and William Contreras, pro se. Service due by 6/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Category Sheet, #4 Summons List, #5 Summons in a Civil Action, #6 Subpoena List, #7 Subpoena - Mario Alberto Cabreras, #8 Subpoena - Centro de Salud Manuel Diaz Garcia Records Department, #9 Subpoena - Waleska Maldonado Claudio, #10 Subpoena - Arq. Joaquin Berdasco Paz, #11 Subpoena - Autoridad de Acueductos, #12 Subpoena - Margarita Mercado Echegaray, #13 Exhibit 1x #14 NPV PSLC Memo) (rim). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
