United States of America v. $29,350 in United States Currency
USA and United States of America |
$29,350 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, and $29,350 in United States Currency |
3:2022cv01207 |
May 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Francisco A Besosa |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WARRANT in Rem Issued to arrest property as to $29,350 in United States Currency. (Attachments: #1 Warrant in Rem) (vdm) |
Filing 4 ORDER re #2 Motion for Issuance of Warrant in rem: GRANTED. Warrant to issue. Signed by Senior Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 05/10/2022. (brc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Senior Judge Francisco A. Besosa (arg) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Issuance of Warrant in rem and Seizure filed by Manuel A. Muniz-Lorenzi on behalf of USA Responses due by 5/20/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Muniz-Lorenzi, Manuel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM against $29,350 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY,, filed by USA. Service due by 8/4/2022, (Attachments: #1 Unsworn Declaration, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Category Sheet)(Muniz-Lorenzi, Manuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.