Berrios-Cotto v. USA
| Alejandra Berrios-Cotto |
| USA |
| 3:2022cv01327 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Daniel R Dominguez |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT. Pursuant to the Court's Opinion and Order (Docket No. 7) granting the United States of Americas Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 5), the Court hereby enters a final judgment DISMISSING THE INSTANT CASE WITH PREJUDICE.THIS CASE IS NOW CLOSED FOR ALL ADMINISTRATIVE AND STATISTICAL PURPOSES.IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED. Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 8/16/2022.(CBM)
|
|
Filing 7
OPINION and ORDER granting #5 Motion to Dismiss; denying #1 Motion to Vacate #5 MOTION to dismiss as to Alejandra Berrios-Cotto, #1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) (Criminal Number 12-cr-931 DRD). See attached Opinion and Order for further details. Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 8/16/2022. (CBM)
|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion filed by Alejandra Berrios-Cotto, Pro se, Re: #5 MOTION to dismiss as to Alejandra Berrios-Cotto filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(gav) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to dismiss as to Alejandra Berrios-Cotto filed by Mariana E. Bauza on behalf of USA Responses due by 8/4/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Bauza, Mariana) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 7/8/2022. (CBM)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER. The government is to respond to the Motion filed at Docket No. #1 within thirty days. Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 7/7/2022. (CBM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Alejandra Berrios-Cotto, Pro se. Responses due by 7/20/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Envelope)(gav) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) (Criminal Number 12-cr-931 DRD) filed by Alejandra Berrios-Cotto, Pro se. Responses due by 7/20/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(gav) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/7/2022: #2 NPV Pro se Law Clerk Memo) (gav). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Berrios-Cotto v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Alejandra Berrios-Cotto | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Mariana E. Bauza |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
