USA v. $302,158.50 SEIZED FROM BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 8699
USA |
$302,158.50 SEIZED FROM BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 8699 |
3:2022cv01352 |
July 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Silvia L Carreno-Coll |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Warrant Issued to arrest/release property as to $302,158.50 Seized From Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Bank Account Ending In 8699. (Attachments: #1 Warrant of Arrest in Rem) (ad) |
Filing 9 ORDER: Granting #4 Motion to Stay. The Government shall file an Informative Motion on or before 9/26/2022 stating if it will move the Court to lift the stay or if the same should remain in effect for a longer period of time. Signed by Judge Silvia L. Carreno-Coll on 07/26/2022. (MRB) |
Filing 8 ORDER: Granting #5 Motion for Issuance of Warrant in rem. Signed by Judge Silvia L. Carreno-Coll on 07/26/2022. (MRB) |
Filing 7 ORDER: Granting #2 Motion to Restrict. Signed by Judge Silvia L. Carreno-Coll on 07/26/2022. (MRB) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Silvia L. Carreno-Coll (arg) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Issuance of Warrant in rem Forfeiture filed by Myriam Y. Fernandez-Gonzalez on behalf of USA Responses due by 8/8/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Fernandez-Gonzalez, Myriam) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Stay filed by Myriam Y. Fernandez-Gonzalez on behalf of USA Responses due by 8/8/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Fernandez-Gonzalez, Myriam) |
Filing 3 ***EX-PARTE***AFFIDAVIT Unsworn Declaration by USA. (Fernandez-Gonzalez, Myriam) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Restrict Document Unsworn Declaration filed by Myriam Y. Fernandez-Gonzalez on behalf of USA Responses due by 8/8/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Fernandez-Gonzalez, Myriam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT In Rem Forfeiture against $302,158.50 SEIZED FROM BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 8699, filed by USA. Service due by 10/24/2022, (Attachments: #1 Category Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fernandez-Gonzalez, Myriam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: USA v. $302,158.50 SEIZED FROM BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 8699 | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: USA | |
Represented By: | Myriam Y. Fernandez-Gonzalez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: $302,158.50 SEIZED FROM BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 8699 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.