United States of America v. TotalEnergies Marketing Puerto Rico Corporation
| United States of America |
| TotalEnergies Marketing Puerto Rico Corporation and Total Petroleum Puerto Rico Corporation, (Total) |
| 3:2022cv01454 |
| September 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Aida M Delgado-Colon |
| Environmental Matters |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment filed by Mark A. Gallagher on behalf of United States of America Responses due by 11/16/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Memorandum in Support, #2 Supplement Certificate of Service)(Gallagher, Mark) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Aida M. Delgado-Colon (arg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Lodging of Consent Decree by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Consent Decree, #2 Affidavit Certificate of Service) (Gallagher, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TotalEnergies Marketing Puerto Rico Corporation, filed by United States of America. Service due by 12/19/2022, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet)(Gallagher, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
